Skip to content

Exercising the textbook masters: Artificial examples

Posted on April 24, 2016 by Cate Hundleby

This term I taught from Douglas Walton’s Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation (Cambridge UP, 2005) and I was excited to do so. I’m a big fan of Walton’s pragmatic approach to argumentation for it’s ability to make sense of fallacies and it’s pluralism — the convergence of which I will be exploring more in my own research and which I think are both valuable for education. Teaching from this comprehensive text promised to immerse me and the students in Walton’s vision.41iksvfzv6l-_sx346_bo1204203200_

I knew of some limitations of Walton’s text from my own perspective, including the almost complete reliance on manufactured examples.  I appreciate, and rely on, manufactured examples to provide maximally clear and uncontroversial exemplars of aspects of argumentation, but they also may mislead students into thinking that argument analysis can and should be cut and dried when it is not. That false belief also can encourage students to think that the application of the analysis they know trumps other forms of interpretation which can make logic a type of bullying tool, even a tool of domination (without anyone having such domineering intentions).

9781554812448My way of addressing this problem (and some of the course’s content requirements) was to supplement Walton with Mark Battersby’s Is that a Fact? A Fieldguide to Statistical and Scientific Information (most recent edition Broadview, 2016). Battersby’s book provides rich detail in its treatment of real examples and many of the themes overlap, allowing for what promised to be a healthy yin and yang approach.  Battersby’s book had also been recommended to me by a friend who teaches CEGEP in Quebec.

Unfortunately, I hadn’t realized Battersby provides no exercises (maybe the new edition does?), and that made it hard to integrate Battersby’s deep theoretical treatment of concrete cases with the logic of argumentation. The course began to seem disjointed and Battersby ended up getting less use that I’d hoped.

Walton too was disappointing.  Some difficult subjects were covered too briefly and not only with only abstract examples but with very few examples for practice. This is the flipside to the comprehensive nature of Walton’s theory: he covers not only argumentation schemes — his stock in trade, but the larger context of dialogue types and the more traditional analysis of argument diagramming and even a dash of formal logic.

I do think the students learned much of what I intended, though I am more conscious of these intentions now. The dialogical context of argumentation orients both Walton’s and Battersby’s approaches, but it also complicates the teaching of reasoning. I believe now that it cannot be taught at the introductory level with real examples. The closest way to do so may be with Tindale’s Fallacies and Argument Appraisal (Cambridge U P, 2007), an extension of Walton’s approach but restricted by a set of inference schemes that receive deep treatment.9780521842082-us-300

bailin_reasoninbalance_webcoverIn the future, for a general course on reasoning, I will look to Battersby and Sharon Bailin’s book Reason in the Balance: An Inquiry Approach to Critical Thinking (now in an affordable Hackett edition too! 2016). I have heard nothing but good things about this book, and I know it contains substantial examples and exercises.  I many have to give up on the desire for real examples (I’m not sure yet). I did this too when I used Brian L. Epstein’s Critical Thinking (Advanced Reasoning Forum), which makes develops a cartoon world to provide artificial restrictions on the interpretation of argument examples. Originally I laughed at this, but I found it extremely valuable.41wm2h764xl-_sx346_bo1204203200_

Many demands must be balanced in developing a critical thinking course, but good examples have to be a priority. That often requires artificial examples and the challenge is to transition from the artificial to the real, in the hope that will encourage “knowledge transfer” — a concept I hope to learn more about so that I’m doing less guess-work in my pedagogy. I think I’ll start here.

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Argumentation, Critical thinking, Feminism & social justice, Model / sample, PedagogyTagged #dialogue #pedagogy #criticalthinking #examples #exercises #DouglasWalton #MarkBattersby #ReasonintheBalance

Published by Cate Hundleby

View all posts by Cate Hundleby

Post navigation

Previous Post Cognitive dissonance and social bias
Next Post Free & open workshops May 18 in Windsor: Argmentation, Bias and Objectivity

Pages

  • Critical Thinking ²
    • 3 steps to choosing a text
      • 1. Goals of CT pedagogy
      • 2. Type of CT analysis
      • 3. Practicing CT
    • Fieldguide to textbooks
      • Comprehensive
      • Argumentation
      • Logic
      • Specialized
    • BLOG: Thought in progress
    • Policies
  • Catherine E. Hundleby
    • Selected Publications
    • Contact

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Archives of Thought in Progress

Tags

#ract adversary advice AILACT anger argumentation bias blogs cheating choice communication critical thinking CRRAR dialectic dialogue emotion evidence evolutionary psychology examples expertise facts failure fallacies feminism fraud gender gendered conference campaign Govier implicit bias informal logic movement internet Johnson & Blair journalism legitimate limits of critical thinking matchmaking methodology objectives pedagogy Perelman philosophy plagiarism race reasoning remix repair scepticism textbooks thought yenta

Favourite Blogs

  • Gin Social
  • FIT IS A FEMINIST ISSUE
  • Sex Geek
  • bikethebridge.wordpress.com/
  • Edu*Rhetor
  • Facts & Other Fairy Tales
  • AILACT
  • FOOD PUNK

Unique Visits

Web Site Hit Counters
Website Hit Counters

Copyright © 2012 · All Rights Reserved · Catherine E. Hundleby

Blog at WordPress.com.
Gin Social

New gins & other explorations

FIT IS A FEMINIST ISSUE

Feminist reflections on fitness, sport, and health

Sex Geek

thoughts on sex and life

bikethebridge.wordpress.com/

Edu*Rhetor

Rhetoric in Higher Education & Society

Facts & Other Fairy Tales

Rantings on life

AILACT

Association for Informal Logic & Critical Thinking

FOOD PUNK

Eating, Talking and Rocking in RVA

Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: