I’m a philosopher and so untrained in methodology although my work in feminist epistemology intersects extensively with feminist methodology. A method of only a very rough sort thus can be found in how I choose textbooks for analysis in my the database.
- Textbooks are suitable for the database if intended for introductory philosophy courses. I exclude other disciplines to keep things manageable. What counts as critical thinking varies greatly from discipline to discipline, and often connects with the disciplinary methodology.
- I include introductory argumentation textbooks because that has become the standard way to teach critical thinking in philosophy, and only a few textbooks (Pinto, Blair and Parr and Kenyon, that I know of) do not focus on argumentation.
- However, books with 50% or more on formal logic do not make the table since that material tends to be covered in separate courses. Likewise, textbook publishers tend to include argumentation skills under critical thinking and distinguish that from formal logic.
- I try to prioritize books by scholars in the field and academic publishers over commercial publishers. My larger goal is to encourage adoption of the more scholarly textbooks, and I try to provide the resources to allow instructors to find their own way to those books.
Suggestions and advice are welcome!